Traveling with young kids is hard. It can be stressful and tiring. Kids need a lot of attention. Parents have to carry extra bags and strollers. Sometimes this makes traveling harder. Darryl Lenz a flight attendant saw this problem. She wanted to make travel easier for parents. She created a product called Ride-On Carry-On. This product is a child seat that attaches to a carry-on bag.
It helps parents carry their kids while also handling luggage. Darryl and her husband Randy took the product to Shark Tank. They hoped to get an investment to grow their business. Will the entrepreneur get a deal on Shark Tank? Check out the Ride-On Carry-On update to find out!
Ride-On Carry-On Net Worth Shark Tank Update 2025
Darcy and Randy Camp went on Shark Tank asking for $50,000 for 25% of their company. This meant they thought their business was worth $200,000. They made a deal with Barbara Corcoran for $50,000 for 25%, keeping the valuation the same. The episode was aired on February 11, 2011. The company operated successfully for several years but eventually shut down. The current net worth of Ride-On Carry-On is $0 in 2025.
Ride-On Carry-On got a deal on Shark Tank. Barbara Corcoran offered them $50,000 for 25% equity in the company. They agreed to the deal. After the show, the company saw success. They sold many products. They sold nearly 20,000 units. They even made $1 million in annual revenue in 2019. This was a great achievement for Darryl and Randy.
However, in 2023 the company went out of business. Their website and social media stopped working. It is unclear why this happened. The company had a good run after Shark Tank but could not continue in the long run.
Ride-On Carry-On got a deal on Shark Tank. Barbara Corcoran offered them $50,000 for 25% equity in the company. They agreed to the deal. After the show, the company saw success. In 2023 the company went out of business. Their website and social media stopped working. It is unclear why this happened. The company had a good run after Shark Tank but could not continue in the long run.
| Shark(s) Name | Offer & Demand | Counter Offer | Accepted? |
| Daymond John | Out | N/A | N/A |
| Robert Herjavec | Out | N/A | N/A |
| Kevin O’Leary | $50,000 for 20% equity | N/A | N/A |
| Barbara Corcoran | $50,000 for 25% equity | N/A | Yes |
| Jeff Foxworthy | Out | N/A | N/A |
Ride-On Carry-On Shark Tank pitch
Darryl Lenz served as a flight attendant for 27 years. She had witnessed numerous parents find it difficult to travel with children. Going on trips with small kids can be challenging. Parents need to manage strollers, bags, and kids. Darryl aimed to simplify things. She conceived the concept of Ride-On Carry-On. The item is a child seat that connects to a carry-on luggage. This concept was inspired by Darryl’s personal experiences traveling alongside her son.
She understood that parents required a method to ease their journeys. Darryl and her spouse Randy began collaborating on the product together. They aimed to develop something that would assist parents. However, they encountered numerous difficulties as well. A major difficulty was ensuring the product’s safety. They had to ensure it could safely accommodate a child. The pair put in a lot of effort to discover suitable materials.
They needed to ensure it was user-friendly. An additional obstacle was attracting attention. They required individuals to be aware of their product. Darryl’s friends from the flight crew assisted by utilizing the product while traveling. This assisted in disseminating the message. The couple encountered numerous additional issues such as designing the correct website.
They aimed for customers to effortlessly locate their product and purchase it online. Despite these obstacles, Darryl and Randy were resolute in their pursuit of success. They collaborated to transform the concept into a company.
When Darryl and Randy entered Shark Tank they felt anxious yet thrilled. They showcased the Ride-On Carry-On item. Darryl described how it functioned. She informed the Sharks that the product was connected to a carry-on luggage bag. The seat enabled children to rest on the bag as parents towed it. This assisted in alleviating the stress associated with traveling with young children.
They additionally provided some figures. The pair had sold close to 20,000 units. The prior year they sold 2000 units. The expense for producing each seat was $7 while the selling price was $39.95. They requested $50,000 in return for 25% ownership of their business. Throughout the pitch, the Sharks posed numerous inquiries. They were curious whether the product was safe.
Darryl guaranteed them that it cleared all safety assessments. The Sharks inquired about their stock. The pair had depleted their inventory and had 2000 orders pending. Darryl stated that the investment was required to enhance product visibility and improve the website. She also wished to expand the business and enhance its visibility. The Sharks were intrigued but held differing opinions on how to assist. Some preferred to emphasize licensing whereas others believed they required additional product branding.
The Sharks inquired with Darryl and Randy about Ride-On Carry-On. A major concern was regarding safety. Jeff Foxworthy as a guest Shark inquired whether the product had cleared all safety inspections. Darryl mentioned that it did. She guaranteed the Sharks that the seat was secure for children aged 8 months to 5 years. The seat was equipped with a seatbelt for extra safety. This alleviated some of the Sharks’ worries.
Another issue was the quantity of products the couple had available. Daymond John inquired about the amount of inventory they possessed. Darryl and Randy stated they had no inventory remaining as all their units were sold out. They additionally had 2000 orders that were yet to be fulfilled. This indicated that individuals favored the product yet it also signified that the couple required additional resources to satisfy demand.
The Sharks found the sales figures impressive but were curious about how the couple intended to manage the orders and expansion.
Kevin O’Leary believed they ought to steer clear of retail. He thought the pair ought to concentrate on licensing the product instead. He was keen on a licensing agreement. Jeff Foxworthy also considered that a luggage company might be interested in licensing the product. Robert Herjavec concurred that a licensing agreement could be more effective than directly selling the product.
Nonetheless, Daymond John remained unconvinced. He believed the business did not require funding. He also cautioned against entering licensing too early.
Despite the doubts and worries the couple had faith in their product. They had faith in its ability to simplify travel for parents. They aimed to expand the business and spread the message. However, they required assistance.
After much discussion, the Sharks gave their responses. Jeff Foxworthy liked the idea but didn’t think it was the right fit for him. He dropped out of the deal. Robert Herjavec also didn’t think the business needed investment. He advised the couple to seek a licensing deal instead. Daymond John was not impressed and also decided not to offer a deal. He believed the couple could succeed without him.
Kevin O’Leary made an offer. He offered $50,000 for 20% equity but wanted to focus on licensing. Kevin believed that licensing the product to luggage manufacturers could bring in more money. He thought they could grow the business that way. However, Barbara Corcoran had a different idea. She offered the couple exactly what they wanted. Barbara offered $50,000 for 25% equity. However, she wanted the couple to focus on branding and marketing.
She thought they could sell the product directly rather than licensing it. Barbara believed her marketing skills would help the business grow. She also believed that the product had a lot of potential. After hearing all the offers, Darryl and Randy chose Barbara’s deal. They were excited to work with her and believed she could help them take the business to the next level.
What Went Wrong With Ride-On Carry-On On Shark Tank?
Despite getting a deal, things didn’t go as planned for Ride-On Carry-On. The product had great potential but the business could not keep up in the long term. In 2023 the company went out of business. The reasons for this are unclear. It seems that the company’s website and social media pages disappeared. This suggests that the business struggled to maintain its success.
Even though they had a great deal with Barbara the company could not keep going. The market might have become too competitive or they may have faced other challenges.
Product Availability
The Ride-On Carry-On was a unique product. It allowed parents to attach a child seat to a rolling carry-on bag. This made traveling with young kids easier. The product was available for purchase online and in some retail stores. The seat retailed for $39.95 and cost $7 to make. However, the company is no longer in business and the product is no longer available for purchase. The website is no longer active and the product is hard to find.
Conclusion
Ride-On Carry-On had a great idea. The product helped parents travel with young kids. After Shark Tank the company enjoyed some success. However, it is no longer in business. Despite this,s the company had a good run and made a big impact on the market.
Hey there, I’m Fatima Muhammad, an International Relations student, with a focus on the strategic dynamics of global relations, One of my favorite shows is Shark Tank. I love it because it showcases the creativity, determination, and strategic thinking of entrepreneurs, which I find inspiring. The show also teaches valuable lessons about innovation, business dynamics, and the importance of perseverance in the face of challenges. Read more About me.
