Doorman Delivery Net Worth Shark Tank Update 2025

Zander Adell had a solution to a significant issue when he arrived at Shark Tank. When they are away from home, many individuals miss package delivery. Even some parcels are stolen. This is why Zander made Doorman. Users may arrange package deliveries with this smartphone app. Packages from customers can be delivered to a Doorman’s warehouse.

They can then choose a time for their package to be delivered to their house. Zander explained how this helps internet buyers with their issues. He clarified that it only costs $3.99 for clients to book a delivery. A subscription option was also available for $19.00 a month. This made it possible to make deliveries indefinitely.

Zander requested $250,000 from the Sharks in exchange for 10% of his business. Will the entrepreneur get a deal on Shark Tank? Check out the Doorman update!

Doorman Delivery Net Worth Shark Tank Update 2025

Zander Adell went on Shark Tank asking for $250,000 for 10% of his company. This meant he thought his business was worth $2,500,000. He made a deal with Mark Cuban for $250,000 for 12%, lowering the valuation to $2,083,333. The episode was aired on January 9, 2015. The scheduled delivery startup later shut down and is no longer operating. The current net worth of Doorman Delivery is $0 in 2025.

The doorman had a hard time after Shark Tank. Despite Zander’s agreement with Robert, the business was unable to expand as intended. They struggled to grow their business. Eventually, the Doorman closed. All services were halted. They had several difficulties, although the precise cause is unknown. The doorman is no longer in operation today.

On Shark Tank, Doorman did indeed get a deal. Zander requested $250,000 for a 10% stake. For 20% the Sharks made an offer of $250,000. Zander accepted Robert’s offer after some bargaining. In exchange for 12% stock, he got $250,000.

Shark(s) nameOffer & DemandCounterofferAccepted?
Barbara Corcoran$250,000 for 20% equity$250,000 for 12% equityN/A
Lori Greiner$250,000 for 20% equity$250,000 for 12% equityN/A
Kevin O’LearyOut N/AN/A
Robert Herjavec$250,000 for 20% equity$250,000 for 12% equityyes 
Mark CubanOut N/AN/A

Doorman Delivery Shark Tank pitch

Zander Adell noticed a need and created Doorman. Many folks get their deliveries when they are away from home. If packages are left outside, they are vulnerable to theft. Certain delivery services won’t leave items alone until someone signs for them. Busy folks find it difficult to get their deliveries as a result. Zander aimed to simplify things for internet shoppers.

To address this issue, he developed Doorman. The software was straightforward and user-friendly. Packages from customers might be delivered to a Doorman’s warehouse. The box would then be delivered by the doorman when the client got home.

Zander had a difficult time getting the business off the ground. The app has to be built by him. Additionally, he needed to design a mechanism to manage all of the packages. He needs delivery drivers and warehouses. These products are all quite expensive.

Zander had a lot of difficulties at first. He had to tell others about the concept. He needed to persuade them to give the service a try. He had to contend with large delivery services as well. These businesses already had a sizable clientele. Zander had faith in his concept despite all of these obstacles. He put a lot of effort into making Doorman a success.

Zander was sure of his concept when he appeared on Shark Tank. He described the Doorman’s operation. According to him, the software allows users to plan when their packages will be delivered. The initial stop for the shipments is a Doorman warehouse. When the consumer chooses, they are then delivered to their house. According to Zander, each delivery costs $3.99.

There was a subscription scheme he added. Consumers might purchase unlimited delivery for $19.00 a month. The Sharks had a lot of questions concerning the company’s operations. They wanted to know if the service was well received. Customers praised it according to Zander. He said that the service was resolving a significant issue. The Sharks believed it was a wise move.

The fact that it made customers’ lives easier pleased them.  However, they were also worried. It may be highly costly to operate a delivery service. Zander’s ability to cover these expenses was a concern for the Sharks. Zander requested $250,000 in exchange for 10% of his business. This was too much for a startup company according to the Sharks. They wanted to find out whether Zander would modify his offer.

The Sharks have a lot of inquiries regarding Doorman. They were curious about the app’s functionality. They questioned Zander about how much it costs to operate the company. The cost of package delivery might be high. The Sharks questioned if the business could turn a profit. The Sharks enquired about consumer interest as well. They were interested in how well the service was received.

Customers enjoyed it, Zander said. He related anecdotes of how the app benefited users. The topic of competitiveness was raised again. If other businesses were doing the same thing, the Sharks enquired. According to Zander, his app was special. The doorman provided clients more control over their delivery, he explained. Additionally, the Sharks enquired about Zander’s growth goals.

They were interested in learning how he would expand the Business. Zander said he planned to open more warehouses in different cities.

The Sharks thought Doorman was a good concept. They believed it resolved an actual issue. However, they were also worried about the expenses of operating the company. Because they believed it to be excessively hazardous, other Sharks chose not to invest. Robert Herjavec, Lori Greiner, and Barbara Corcoran wanted to strike a transaction. They made a $250,000 offer for 20% of the business.

This was too much for Zander. He offered something in return. He requested $250,000 in exchange for 12 percent. Lori and Barbara made the decision to leave. The risk they believed was too great. Robert Herjavec however remained inside. He consented to pay Zander $250,000 in exchange for 12%. Zander agreed to the terms.

What Went Wrong With the Doorman On Shark Tank?

The doorman was given a Shark Tank contract. However, not every Shark showed interest. Some said the prices were excessive. Others believed that the company was too dangerous. The delivery industry is difficult, according to the Sharks who left. The expense of operating it is high. Whether Doorman could earn enough money to be successful was uncertain to them.

The doorman had a lot of obstacles to overcome even after landing a deal. The business was exceedingly difficult to grow. The time and resources required to run a delivery service are substantial. The business could have eventually shut down as a result of these issues.

Product Availability

There is no longer a doorman available. The application has been closed. Customers are no longer able to book deliveries using it. The software provided a special function when it was in use. Clients may select when they want their items delivered. Those who were not home during typical delivery hours benefited from this. Each delivery of the service costs $3.99.

A subscription option was also available for $19.00 a month. Unlimited deliveries are available to subscribers. Before delivering products to clients, doormen kept them in warehouses. This contributed to the app’s uniqueness. This functionality is absent from the majority of other delivery providers. The doorman was limited to specific cities. The business intended to develop, but it was unable to do so quickly enough.

Conclusion

Doorman was a brilliant concept that addressed a pressing need. It made it easier for individuals to get their products on schedule and securely. Zander Adell put a lot of effort into making the app a hit. On Shark Tank, Doorman struck a deal with Robert Herjavec.

However, following the event, the firm had several difficulties. It was challenging to expand and manage the business’s operating expenses. The doorman is no longer in operation today. The website and app have been removed. Despite closing the business demonstrated how technology can address pressing issues.